Friday, November 18, 2011
Pharmacogenomics in Clinical Practice: Where Do We Go From Here?
“I think we need to take genetic testing out of the domain of laboratory testing and move it to the domain of physical examination. It can then be one more piece of information for the physician to consider and we wouldn't need to focus on the cost.”
“There are a lot of things we do during a physical examination that have never been demonstrated to be cost-effective. Physicians look at their patients' toes as part of an annual physical. Have you ever seen a study that shows that looking at your toes is cost-effective?”“We need to conceptualize genetic testing as a part of the physical exam rather than as a laboratory test that needs to be ordered so you can have the information at the time you are seeing the patient. For example, if you're starting a patient on warfarin, or you are considering whether to start him on warfarin, and you already know that he is going to metabolize warfarin a lot more slowly or that he's going to be a lot more sensitive to it, you can take that into account in the same way you would probably use a lower dose if your patient were frail or elderly. That is where I think the field needs to move.”
“The solution is one that we are piloting here, which is to genotype all patients for all polymorphisms that may affect drug response. You'll then have the results when you need them and your costs will be much lower than doing each test as a one-off laboratory test.
In the current system, you see the patient and want to prescribe a drug, and you say to yourself, ‘Maybe I should order a pharmacogenetic test. But I don't know how to do that, I don't know how long it is going to take to get results, and I don't know if my patient is going to get reimbursed for it. Oh, who cares. I am just going to prescribe the drug.'
“Unless someone says that you can't prescribe the drug without doing the test, or unless we change the way we look at how pharmacogenomic testing should be incorporated into clinical practice, the system is unlikely to change.”
DNA in the News
See more at theheart.org/article/1300023.do
Bringing Personalized Prescribing to the Community Pharmacy
Why do you think genetics is important?
I tell my patients that through DNA technology, we are able to determine what type of drug metabolizer they are. I explain how this information can be used to help predict if they are at risk of having bad reactions to drugs (too much drug exposure) or poor response to drugs (too little exposure to the medication). Genetics is important because it allows Health Care Providers, like myself, to predict who will have “bad reactions” or “poor responses” to medications.
How would you define personalized prescribing in your own words?
‘Personalized prescribing” is the analysis and incorporation of patient specific factors (i.e. CYP450 metabolizing capacity–derived from DNA testing) prior to prescribing, dispensing and/ or choosing new medications (including OTC, vitamins, herbals) and doses. While we typically think of “prescribing” as something only Physicians do, I feel “personalized prescribing” is something we can all embrace; Physician, Pharmacist & Patient.
Why did you decide to launch this program at Wasem’s?
As a Pharmacist working in a community pharmacy, my number one goal is to serve the patients of the community. Our services are what bring patients into the store and they are what keep them coming back for years. Keeping patients safe through more informed medication and dose choices is the best service we can provide and “personalized prescribing” is the best tool I know of to do so.
What efforts have you made to educate physicians and patients in your community about personalized prescribing?
We have in the past and continue to educate the community through newspaper advertisements, co-marketing posters and speaking with community volunteer groups like the Rotary, Lion’s club and retirement centers.
Since pharmacists are able to order laboratory tests in Washington State for the purpose of monitoring drug therapy, I often find that the prescribers are unacquainted with “personalized prescribing.” I send them a fax describing what the genetic results mean, and any alternate medications or dose adjustments that they might considered based on the results. The response has been all positive. Doctors are noting the recommendations in their patient charts. I plan to host a dinner soon for Health Care Providers to educate them about “personalized prescribing.”
You have now made several successful interventions on a patient’s behalf; can you share one of these stories?
Yes, here is one of the first testimonials I received after a successful pharmacogenetic intervention. This patient struggled with adverse drug reactions her whole life, and was relieved that science and technology are finally beginning to understand and incorporate “personalized prescribing:”
“Thank you so much for guiding me through the new way to approach medication. Armed with the letter to my health care provider, I feel confident that finally my doctor will be able to adjust some of my medications. Maybe some day genetic testing will be a routine procedure before prescribing meds. How much misery and money could be saved if we get it right the first time…”
Did You Know?
CYP2C19 is not just involved in Plavix metabolism, it is involved in the metabolism of ~10% of medications.
Other common medications processed by CYP2C19 include:
· voriconazole
· Prilosec
· Prevacid
· Aciphex
· Nexium
· Soma
· Lexapro
· Silenor
· Dexilant
Embassies Crack Down on Third-party Immigration DNA Tests
Third-party resellers of DNA testing abound on the internet. Unfortunately, many of them are unfamiliar with strict requirements for immigration DNA testing. The problem has become so pronounced that many Embassies are now requiring petitioners to contact AABB-accredited laboratories directly.
Natalie Messelt from the US Embassy in Addis Ababa stated, “A petitioner must independently choose his or her own AABB lab, make the appointment, and go to the collection site directly. The collection site must then send the specimen to the main AABB lab testing site directly,
through the lab's internal, controlled system. Third-party vendors include, but may not be limited to, private companies or clearinghouses that serve as intermediaries to make appointments on behalf of petitioners or beneficiaries. The authority for collecting DNA specimens in the United States resides exclusively with the AABB labs and their directly affiliated collection sites.”
The immigration process is complex and lengthy, don’t risk delays and unneeded additional expenses of retesting – contact the AABB labs directly.